How Pay Per Click Is Different From Traditional Media Spending
I came at this from the PPC side. Having done AdWords and Yahoo PPC freelance before joining up with an interactive agency, I didn't deal much with clients used to traditional ad spends. But clients with larger budgets seem more likely to have this orientation. It was a shocker and an adjustment. But it's better than clients with no budgets!
Here's the traditional assumption: we define exactly how much to spend each month for the next year, and we cannot change those amounts during the course of the year.
I understand businesses have budgets and planning ahead is essential. But the problem is you can miss opportunities you discover along the way.
Suppose in your PPC efforts you discover you can make $5 for every $1 you
spend- maybe you only expected to make $3 for each $1. But you're
getting $2 extra in profit- and if you could reinvest that $2 in PPC, you can make it $10. Feed the success to make more profit.
Strike while the iron's hot. In PPC you can't assume the same ROAS will be there next year. Things change quickly. The more you spend, the more you learn, the quicker you become efficient and dominate the competition, and the more profit you can make. And if not you, then your competitor, and their rigorous ad testing while getting volume clicks increases their CTR and quality score and distances them from you, perhaps prohibitively.
Back to traditional vs. PPC spends:
Rigid, highly segmented, calendar-based budgets can make your PPC specialist lose their hair. Why? Because no one can predict how much can be spent in any one segment of a campaign, and optimizations can change maximum spends.
In the traditional ad buy, you could buy a billboard for a week of exposure- the cost is fixed, the number of views is unknown. In PPC, the cost of your billboard (text ad) is determined by the number of cars that drive by it.
That's not a perfect analogy though. It's more like this:
For a "billboard" (text ad) in the PPC world, the amount you can spend depends on:
Segmented budget complications: When you segment a campaign- say you want some geotargeting aimed at Canadians, and another campaign that's U.S.-focused, and another campaign that places ads on specific Google content sites... if you tell your PPC specialist you want a different budget for each, here's the can of worms you're opening:
- What if one campaign can't spend the amount you wanted? Do you want them to increase bids in that campaign until it spends enough? What if that eats away at your margins?
- What if one of your campaigns has a much better ROAS than the others- won't you want to put more money into it to increase your conversions and profits?
- What if a campaign spends the amount you want, but when you optimize it to a lower cost per click, it underspends? Which is more important?
Budget assignment can evolve as you learn what each campaign can do. But the more budgets you have in place, the more time a PPC specialist spends trying to meet those budget requirements.
There are multiple PPC management strategies, and they can be mutually exclusive. Some strategies include:
1. Spend a specific budget while trying to reduce CPC.
2. Optimize ROAS- if a keyword costs a lot per click, it's ok if the conversion rate and revenue are high enough to give you a good ROAS.
3. Maximize number of leads- you want good visibility, reach, CTR, and conversion rates (CR) for your lead submission form.
4. Improve lead quality- you have to focus on keyword relevance and CTR as well as CR, possibly while tracking leads all the way through the sales cycle.
Every client is in a different spot and has different goals. Some don't have the technical ducks in a row to measure conversions. Some only understand budget and CPC and have never heard of conversion rate. It's a process, so we educate our clients about better tracking, better KPI's, and help them get the technology in place to optimize PPC for the business results that mean success for them.
And ultimately, PPC should be about getting more, better, and more affordable business results.
Strike while the iron's hot. In PPC you can't assume the same ROAS will be there next year. Things change quickly. The more you spend, the more you learn, the quicker you become efficient and dominate the competition, and the more profit you can make. And if not you, then your competitor, and their rigorous ad testing while getting volume clicks increases their CTR and quality score and distances them from you, perhaps prohibitively.
Back to traditional vs. PPC spends:
Rigid, highly segmented, calendar-based budgets can make your PPC specialist lose their hair. Why? Because no one can predict how much can be spent in any one segment of a campaign, and optimizations can change maximum spends.
In the traditional ad buy, you could buy a billboard for a week of exposure- the cost is fixed, the number of views is unknown. In PPC, the cost of your billboard (text ad) is determined by the number of cars that drive by it.
That's not a perfect analogy though. It's more like this:
For a "billboard" (text ad) in the PPC world, the amount you can spend depends on:
- the location of the billboard (niche/demographic/competition),
- how stimulating the ad is (CTR),
- whether the ad is relevant to the demographic
that drives by it (quality score), and
- whether the store advertised delivers a good experience (landing page/quality score).
Segmented budget complications: When you segment a campaign- say you want some geotargeting aimed at Canadians, and another campaign that's U.S.-focused, and another campaign that places ads on specific Google content sites... if you tell your PPC specialist you want a different budget for each, here's the can of worms you're opening:
- What if one campaign can't spend the amount you wanted? Do you want them to increase bids in that campaign until it spends enough? What if that eats away at your margins?
- What if one of your campaigns has a much better ROAS than the others- won't you want to put more money into it to increase your conversions and profits?
- What if a campaign spends the amount you want, but when you optimize it to a lower cost per click, it underspends? Which is more important?
Budget assignment can evolve as you learn what each campaign can do. But the more budgets you have in place, the more time a PPC specialist spends trying to meet those budget requirements.
There are multiple PPC management strategies, and they can be mutually exclusive. Some strategies include:
1. Spend a specific budget while trying to reduce CPC.
2. Optimize ROAS- if a keyword costs a lot per click, it's ok if the conversion rate and revenue are high enough to give you a good ROAS.
3. Maximize number of leads- you want good visibility, reach, CTR, and conversion rates (CR) for your lead submission form.
4. Improve lead quality- you have to focus on keyword relevance and CTR as well as CR, possibly while tracking leads all the way through the sales cycle.
Every client is in a different spot and has different goals. Some don't have the technical ducks in a row to measure conversions. Some only understand budget and CPC and have never heard of conversion rate. It's a process, so we educate our clients about better tracking, better KPI's, and help them get the technology in place to optimize PPC for the business results that mean success for them.
And ultimately, PPC should be about getting more, better, and more affordable business results.
Share this article
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: How Pay Per Click Is Different From Traditional Media Spending.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogadmin.fuelinteractive.com/mt-tb.cgi/111
Search
Subscribe!
Recent Entries
- Google Analytics' Game-Changing Features
- Climate Change: A Family Affair ~ Blog Action Day, 2009
- Freshen Up Your Site
- Blog Action Day - 2009
- The Power of the CMS
- The Results Are In: Where Marketers are Spending $$ in a Down Economy
- smart(TM) Commuting, Smart Computing
- Interactive Marketers Need The Bing Worse Than Tony Soprano
- Boost Your Site's Success By Multiplying User Sessions by 3!
- What the heck is Twitter and how do I use it?
- New PPC ROI Calculator
- Sure, you can buy the data... But can you analyze it?
- To Append or Not to Append?
- Restaurant Web Design, PPC, SEO, Social Media, Email Marketing and More
- Five Surefire Ways to Control Scope Creep
- Fuel Interactive Announces Retro-Optimization to Drive Client Business in the Web 1.5 World
- Following Cassey into Fuel Interactive...
- The Life and Times of A Twitter Link
- How to Maximize Your ROI with Conversion Optimization: A Case Study
- New Pay Per Click Articles on Search Engine Journal
- 8 Ways Clients Can Help Their PPC Agency Succeed
- ENOUGH with the Popcorn Already!!
- Hotel Boosts Revenue 40% With Private Social Network
- Improve Your Site Traffic by 2,900% Through the Power of Social Marketing
- New Pay Per Click Advertising Articles
- No, Google Is Right: Bounces Are People Too
- Personality is Key in Social Media
- Pubcon 2008: Social Media Trifecta
- 5 Steps to PPC Optimization: Brian Carter's Scary SEO Presentation
- "Toys R Us" Toying with the Social Networking Scene
- Superadvanced Google Analytics Reporting for AdWords
- A/B Testing: How Much Data Do You Need?
- Spleling Iz Importent
- Google Optimizing Their Optimizer?
- 5 SUPERDUMB Mistakes with AdWords Keywords
- SEO Is Not For Rankings, Traffic Or Conversions
- Job Opening! SEO/PPC/Social Media Specialist
- Outrageous Minimum Bids: New AdWords Quality Score in Action
- 5 Reasons Why Email Marketing is A Lot Like College Football
- Google AdWords Interview on the New Quality Score Changes
- The 7 Essential Talents of An Excellent SEO/PPC Employee
- 10 Reasons Why SEO Can't Help Obama
- SEO, PPC, Social Media: An Easy Way to Keep Up with the News
- Woman on the Street Interview: Twitter, RSS, Blogs, and Logs
- The Dirty Part of Web Analytics
- 5 Powerful Local Search Marketing Tactics: My SMX Local 2008 Presentation
- Email Marketing Proofs for Dummies: The 7-Step solution
- SEO Women: Sumo Wrestling Fight on Baseball Field
- Social Networking & Web 2.0 for Professional Associations
- Search Marketing Business: Are You Losing Your Shirt Because You're Wearing the Wrong Shirt?
- AdWords 911: The 4 Step Emergency Fix for Dying AdWords Accounts
- The Ten Commandments of SEM 2.0
- Google Local Search SEO (Blended Search): Optimizing Universal Search Results for Local Businesses
- The SEM 2.0 Pyramid (SEO + SMO + PPC)
- 10 Tips for PR 2.0 and a Sexier Press Release
- Shame on You: Twitter CAN be a Sales Tool
- Online Reputation Management: Twitter, Summize, & iGoogle
- Is SEO Spam? What Search Rankings Do You Deserve?
- 7 Easy SEO Tips for Bloggers Who Are Allergic to HTML
- Josh Williams
- The Killer Trifecta: Twitter + Blog + Social Bookmarking
- 8 Tips for Power Networking on Twitter
- The Problem with Long Tail Keywords
- Maximum ROI with Third-Party Email Lists
- 13 Twitterers Confess Why They Unfollow
- Why and How to Do Social Media @ CreateSouth
- 14 Ways To Get Unfollowed on Twitter
- Warn Google! TwitterSpam Memes Could Game Search Rankings
- 6 Steps to TwitterFame, or at least Twitteriety
- Does Web 2.0 Really Merit Different Metrics from Advertising?
- 8 Steps to Keeping SEO Clients by Getting the Results That Matter to Them
- 11 Coolest Google/Twitter Combo Gadgets and Devices
- Crucial: Google Local Search Results
- Endless Fun PPC Advertising Case Study
- Online Press Release Attachments: Word Doc vs. PDF
- Why Pay-Per-Click is the Perfect Advertising Tactic in Uncertain Financial Times
- Are You Googleable? Increase Your Findability
- SEO/PPC Success Measures and KPI's
- How Pay Per Click Is Different From Traditional Media Spending
- Top 5 Reasons Not to do Post-Pay Billing AdWords in an Agency Setting
- What makes a developer great?
- Choose Your Words Carefully: Who Are You Writing For?
- Interactive Planning
- Mobile Marketing - Not Just For the Sake Thereof
- SEO Hot Topics & Sources For More Info
- Ten Steps to Great Search Engine Rankings

Leave a comment